How Humans Will Mine Asteroids and Comets






The idea of mining the planets, Moon, asteroids, and comets for their valuable mineral resources is not new. Science fiction writers began weaving tales of space mines, worked by crusty, usually antisocial old prospectors, in the 1930s. Invariably, these difficult, dirty, lonely operations in the far frontiers of the solar system resembled the mines in a more familiar frontier situation—the nineteenth-century American West. There were "decadent boom towns with grossly inflated prices," University of Arizona scientist John S. Lewis points out in his recent book about space mining. These stories also featured "boisterous miners in town for a few days to pick up supplies and go on a bender," along with "slick gamblers, painted women, and a variety of dubious establishments." 41

Not surprisingly, drunk miners, gamblers, and painted women were not part of the vision of the scientists who began discussing asteroid mining in the 1970s. The technological advances made during the U.S. space program had recently culminated in several successful manned Moon landings. And the experts became convinced that mining asteroids, and perhaps comets too, would actually be feasible in the near future.

Since that time, scientists working for both NASA and private companies have been doing detailed studies of space mining. The general consensus is that most of the technology needed to begin modest mining operations on an asteroid already exists. The main ingredient still missing is the commitment of a large amount of money by a government, corporation, or group of private investors. The experts all agree that it is only a matter of time before humans begin exploiting the tremendous wealth of resources waiting for them in the solar system.

An Extremely Profitable Business

The first questions that all potential investors ask, of course, are what is the nature of these abundant resources contained in asteroids and comets, and what are they worth? Scientists answer first that the asteroids are composed of iron, nickel, platinum, and other metals, as well as sulfur, aluminum oxide, carbon compounds, and other minerals. Many asteroids

Mining the solar systems riches was the subject of the 1981 movie Outland. This shot from the film shows a mining colony on one of Jupiters moons.
Mining the solar system's riches was the subject of the 1981 movie Outland . This shot from the film shows a mining colony on one of Jupiter's moons.
also contain smaller amounts of volatiles, including hydrogen, oxygen, and water.

As for the value of these materials to people on Earth, Lewis cites the example of the smallest known M-type asteroid—Amun. It is about 1.2 miles across and has a mass of about 30 billion tons. To put this large tonnage in perspective, imagine that the raw materials from the mining operation are loaded into a fleet of space shuttles like those presently in NASA's fleet. The cargo bay of a typical shuttle holds about twenty-five tons, equivalent to 250 two-hundred-pound people. It would take four hundred shuttles (or four hundred trips by one shuttle), therefore, to haul ten thousand tons of asteroidal material; and it would take 1.2 billion shuttles (or 1.2 billion trips by one shuttle) to carry all of the materials mined from Amun.

Regarding the materials themselves, Amun's total tonnage breaks down into many different metals. The most abundant of these are iron and nickel, which alone would have a market value of about $8 trillion. (Keep in mind that a trillion is a million times a million.) Supplies of another metal, cobalt, on Amun would be worth perhaps $6 trillion. Then there are rarer metals such as platinum, iridium, osmium, and palladium, which together would add another $6 trillion to the investors' profits. The nonmetals, including carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, oxygen, hydrogen, and gallium, would be worth at least $2 trillion. If humans mined all of Amun, therefore (which would take many years), the gross profits would come to at least $22 trillion. It is difficult to estimate the upfront costs of such a mining operation. But even if they were as high as $1 trillion, the net profits would still be $21 trillion. Clearly, asteroid mining will be an extremely profitable business.

Remember also that all of the valuable resources and profits cited are from a single small asteroid. What would all of the asteroids in the asteroid belt together be worth? Lewis speculates about the asteroidal iron alone:

To raise the standard of living of the people of Earth to present-day North American, Japanese, or Western European levels, we need about 2 billion tons of iron and steel each year. With the asteroidal supplies of metal at hand, we could meet Earth's needs for the next four hundred million years. . . . Suppose that we were to extract all the iron in the belt and bring it back to Earth. Spreading this amount of iron uniformly over all the continents gives us a layer of iron . . . half a mile thick. . . . This is enough iron to cover all the continents with a steel frame building 8,000 stories (80,000 feet, or 15.2 miles) tall. 42

When one factors in the other metals available in the asteroid belt alone, along with the many nonmetals, the total resources could sustain a human population a million times larger than the present one for several thousand years. And this does not take into account the trillions of asteroids and comets in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. (The comets contain far fewer metals, but do have many minerals, as well as an abundance of volatiles that could be used for food production and making fuels.)

Supplies for Earth and the New Frontier

The discussion of the monetary worth of asteroids and comets must not divert attention from the other major reason to pursue the dream of mining these objects. Namely, the metals, minerals, and volatiles acquired in such operations would help conserve supplies of these materials on Earth. At present, these supplies are marginally sufficient to sustain the planet's present population. But that population will inevitably grow and supplies of a number of metals and other commodities will begin to run out.

Also, processing metals and minerals (separating them from the rocky mixtures in which most are trapped) pollutes Earth's air, soil, and water. This problem will be eliminated entirely in space mining since all of the processing will take place far from Earth. At first glance, it would seem that such operations would simply shift the pollution problem from Earth to outer space. But this need not be the case. William Hartmann explains:

Some writers have raised the specter of humanity despoiling the solar system, in the same manner that over-industrialization is beginning to despoil Earth's environment. But . . . with a careful balance of research and exploitation, we could learn from and process materials in space in a [clean] way that would [also] begin to take the pressure off Earth's ecosystem. A transition from Earth-based manufacturing to interplanetary manufacturing could eventually reduce pollution and ravaging of Earth by an Earth-based society bent on ripping the last dwindling resources from the land. 43

There is another dimension to human acquisition and consumption of cosmic resources, however. Nearly all the experts agree that by the time space mining becomes widespread, only a small percentage of the materials mined will end up on Earth. Instead, a major portion of these resources will be used to construct and sustain human colonies and cities floating in space. Space, they say, will become a vast new frontier that will attract many people born on Earth, helping to stabilize or at least slow the growth of the planet's population. (And of course, over time even more people will be born in space.)

A City in the Sky

As planetary scientist John S. Lewis says in this excerpt from his fascinating book Mining the Sky , the asteroid belt contains enough iron to construct an enormous space city.

We have enough asteroidal iron [in the asteroid belt] to make a metal sphere . . . 550 miles in diameter. Hollowed out into rooms with iron walls, like a gigantic city, it would make a spherical space structure over . . . 1,200 miles in diameter. . . . With a nine-foot ceiling, we could provide each family with a floor area of 3,000 square feet for private residential use and still set aside 3,000 square feet of public space per family. This artificial world would contain enough room to accommodate more than ten quadrillion [a million times a billion] people. Very simply, that is a million times the ultimate population capacity of Earth.

It is fair to ask why the inhabitants of such colonies, as well as people still living on Earth, would choose to get metals, minerals, and other resources from asteroids and comets rather than from larger cosmic bodies. Why not mine the Moon first, for example, or perhaps the planet Mars? After all, the Moon and Mars are both far larger than all of the asteroids put together, and both are closer to Earth than most of the asteroids and comets (the NEAs being an obvious exception).

First, whether they live on Earth or in space cities, people will naturally want to obtain cosmic resources as easily and cheaply as possible. The fact is that mining the asteroids will be far easier and more economical than mining a large body like the Moon. The Moon's surface gravity is about one-sixth that of Earth, which is strong enough to require a good deal of fuel to land miners and their equipment on its surface. More importantly, getting the processed metals and minerals off the Moon's surface would take even larger amounts of fuel. An added problem is that most of the valuable metals and minerals on the Moon are spread out over thousands of square miles and bound up inside mixtures of rock and dirt, many lying deep underground; it would require a lot of exploration, as well as strenuous and expensive digging and processing, to free them.

Zero-Gravity Mining Techniques

In contrast, most asteroids and comets are small, manageable, and have extremely tiny gravities, all of which make them easier to mine. Mining ships will also not land on or take off from these bodies, which will save enormous amounts of fuel. A typical ship will stop beside an asteroid and the miners, wearing spacesuits, will transport over to the worksite by pushing off the side of the ship. (They may also use small jets attached to their suits.) This is possible because the ship, the miners, and the asteroid are all nearly weightless. For this reason, the miners will need to attach long tethers to their suits and tie the opposite ends of the tethers to spikes hammered into the asteroid. This will keep them from accidentally floating away into space while they are working.

In addition, the mined materials in such a situation are, like the miners, nearly weightless, and will

In this illustration of an asteroid mining operation, an astronaut is tethered to the surface. He uses a jet pack to maneuver.
In this illustration of an asteroid mining operation, an astronaut is tethered to the surface. He uses a jet pack to maneuver.
not need to be lifted off the asteroid's surface. This will not only save fuel, but will greatly reduce other risks. According to the scientists at the Minor Planet Center (at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory):

Getting asteroidal materials is not a risky business, like launching materials up from Earth or the Moon. Transporting asteroidal materials is all "interorbital" [i.e., takes place in orbit]. [There will be] no risks of crashes, no huge rockets. The gravity of the asteroids is negligible. A person can jump off any but the largest asteroids with leg power alone. 44

Another advantage of mining asteroids rather than the Moon is that the asteroidal metals and minerals are concentrated in a small, easily accessible space and are much purer in content. Almost all asteroids, Daniel Durda points out, "have a hundred times more metal not bound up in rocky minerals than do moon rocks." 45 On S-type and especially M-type asteroids, such materials will require very little processing. Indeed, a fair amount will be collectable even before the digging process begins. The surface of such bodies is rich in granules of metal, ranging from sand- to perhaps fist-sized pieces, all mixed with sootlike dirt. These granules "can easily be separated from the dirt," the Minor Planet Center experts say,

using only magnets [in the form of magnetic rakes] and soft grinders. Some engineering designs have "centrifugal grinders," whereby the dirt is fed into a rotating tank and shattered against the wall a time or two. Out come little metal disks, which are separated using simple magnets. 46

Once digging operations begin, larger deposits of metals and minerals will be separated with bigger grinding and chopping devices. Most likely, the miners will allow the loose rocks to float up and away from the asteroid's surface, where a large canopy, a sort of tarp made of nylon or some other tough material, will catch them. One group of experts describes the advantages of such a canopy:

Companies will most probably use a canopy because the canopy would be quite profitable in terms of the amount of loose ore [rock mixture] it would collect. It would also prevent the area [around the worksite] from turning into a big dark cloud of debris which would pose problems for the operations. . . . A double-cone-shaped canopy is put around the asteroid. . . . The canopy is then rotated. A [small robotic device called a] dust kicker goes down to the asteroid and . . . kicks up the ore at low velocity. The ore strikes the canopy and is deflected so that it tends to rotate with the canopy, eventually sliding down the two [cone-shaped] funnels. 47

The equipment for processing the metal- and mineral-rich ore will be located at the tips of the two cones. After all of the usable materials have been mined, the miners will tie off the ends of the canopy and tow it either to a floating city or into Earth's orbit. That way, the canopy doubles as both a collection apparatus and transport device.

Habitats for the Miners

During these mining operations, which could take months or years, depending on the size of the asteroid and the number of workers and machines, the miners will need somewhere to live. The quarters aboard the ship itself will likely be too cramped for such a long stay. So the miners will build a temporary habitat, which will use mostly on-site materials and thereby eliminate the need and cost of bringing them from Earth.

To some degree, the kinds of materials required to erect and sustain a human habitat for such miners will dictate the type of asteroid the mining operation will target. Although M-types have more metals than other kinds of asteroids, probably a majority of the asteroids mined will be S-types or C-types. These bodies have larger supplies of oxygen, hydrogen, water (in the form of ice), and other volatiles that are essential to the habitats. If necessary, additional volatiles can be obtained from comets; storehouses of cometary volatiles could be positioned at various points in space for asteroid miners to draw from.

As for how these lighter materials will be converted, first the miners will melt the ices to produce water for drinking, cooking, and bathing. They will also extract oxygen and hydrogen from the ices and combine them with various minerals to make beams, walls, pipes, and other parts for their habitat. The miners can also employ the oxygen and hydrogen to make fuel, both to power the ship on its return voyage and to sell to companies or individuals

In a scene from Outland, space miners are shown in a habitat built on-site. Large versions of such habitats will feature most of the comforts of home.
In a scene from Outland , space miners are shown in a habitat built on-site. Large versions of such habitats will feature most of the comforts of home.
in space cities or on Earth. This means that relatively little, if any, fuel will have to be brought from Earth, making space mines and habitats almost completely self-sufficient.

Indeed, nothing would be wasted during the mining operation. "Even unprocessed soil," says Durda, "could be used for shielding" to protect miners and other astronauts "on longer missions from cosmic rays and solar flares [dangerous radiation from the Sun]." 48

Setting Large-Scale Goals

These mining situations and techniques are not some flight of fancy that will take centuries to become reality. NASA, various groups of scientists, and some private companies have already begun drawing up plans for such space mining missions. They know that certain inherent difficulties and problems will have to be overcome, or at least planned for, to make this huge undertaking work. For example, even in the case of the NEAs, which will surely be the first targets for space miners, a typical round trip will be two to five years. This is a long time for a company of miners to be separated from family, friends, and society in general. Long periods of work in weightless conditions may also have a negative effect on the miners' health. Astronauts who have spent many months in weightless conditions in Earth's orbit have developed muscle weakness, loss of calcium and red blood cells, and other problems. And of course, such ventures will be extremely costly and require long-term financial and other commitments from governments, companies, and tens of thousands, if not millions, of individuals.

Assuming such commitments do materialize, however, the technical difficulties will be relatively minimal. Indeed, scientists emphasize that humans can reach and mine the asteroids and comets mostly using technology that exists or is presently in development. It is true that this technology will have to be applied on a much vaster scale than people have ever experienced. But it is doable nonetheless. "This isn't Star Wars," say the Minor Planet Center researchers. "The asteroids aren't against us. It's really pretty simple stuff." People have already demonstrated the ability to travel and live in space, and "the engineering factors that go into 'docking' with an asteroid are not difficult." 49

The biggest difficulty will rest in the human decision to begin the mammoth enterprise of exploiting the riches of the solar system. Countries, peoples, and governments have accomplished such large-scale goals before, as the Europeans did when they settled and transformed North and South America or as the Americans did when they aimed for and reached the Moon in the 1960s. One thing is certain. These prior undertakings, though enormous in their own times, will be positively dwarfed by the adventure that awaits humanity in the asteroid belt and beyond.




User Contributions:

Mark
Report this comment as inappropriate
May 25, 2008 @ 4:04 am
I believe the place to start this process is by targeting small meteoroids (1m in dia and smaller) that pass close to Earth or burn up in it's atmosphere each year, capturing ones suitable for processing and bringing them to Earth orbit for processing. After processing, highly valued metals or minerals could be returned to Earth for immediate return on investment and things like iron(turned into steel?) and other components whose value does not justify the cost of returning them to Earth would remain in orbit where further processing would be done to use those materials for constructing facilities and equipment in space.
robbylynn
Report this comment as inappropriate
Dec 14, 2009 @ 1:01 am
When do we get started? It's certain that government efforts for this enterprise would take too long. Any company looking for someone to head out to the asteroids and spend some time - call me up. I'd leave tomorrow.
I think the biggest challenge facing us right now is convincing the general public that this is feasible stuff. Convince the populous that asteroid mining is the next natural step (which it is) and we'll be there in no time flat.
Break out the solar sails, and let's go forth!!
Scott
Report this comment as inappropriate
Sep 5, 2010 @ 3:15 pm
Challenging, how many venture capitalists would try this one! There must be some Billionare who is willing to try to become the first Trillionare and lead the planet into a new golden age of ample resources and orbital/zero G manufacturing? Though please take your time, my country is a primary produce of raw materials and a mass supply of these becoming available would surely ruin our economy to satisfy the hungry dragon.

Ok so assuming you were a billionare capitalist with 10 years to live and a real hard on for space exploration who wanted to gain immortality by becoming the first space merchant and no qualms about losing their fortune to do so. So you somehow acquired Boeing and several mines and ran at cost to produce a modular space mining ship/fleet of epic proportions!.. or just a small tug to tow weightless near earth asteroids to Earth Orbit for processing.

Then leased the other equipment and borrowed expertise from a government to launch from Earth to build a sectioned space craft in many shuttle missions to construct a spacedock from the international space station, that's your main initial sunk cost.
Then using the light weight new prototype plasma magnet engines you could get out to the belt and perform a 150 day return mission on the metal asteroids! If the little one is $22 Trillion and you brought it back you just made USA + CHINA + JAPANs entire economic output for a year in less than 6 months, uhuh. What are you waiting for? Permission? Get those roids pinheads!!

Gradually build a manufacturing facility in space and build up the space dock. Eventually build a space elevator frame from the materials processed in space and lower it into earths atmosphere somehow. I'm no engineer but how about connected to the dock there is an enourmous series of seawater tubes that can 'flush' materials down to earth through 120km of 'pipes' and sorting equipment to dry docks ready to be shipped to manufacturers on the ground. Or a 'bicycle pump' elevator that just slows descent with air compression. Well, surely many other people can think of logistics to get the stuff to the ground without it burning up or colliding, we need it down here for buildings, roads & ships. If we can change the mining industry to space mining and make it more efficient, we can retrain miners for space mining and agriculture/aquaculture and support a bigger earth, with more nicer apartment buildings, better pricing power parity for all and cleaner faster mass transit systems. Plus if we could figure out an affordable space elevator, or if this industry supplied the materials and the incentive to build one, we could send radioactive pollution to the sun.

Then construct a tug with a method for towing the lighter dust back in those 'cones', and you knew you could get there first and just collect the 'easy' to mine layers from multiple asteroids with a giant electro magnet.

The only organisation with sufficient expertise is NASA and they take a lot of the best people, you'd have to poach staff from many countries to achieve this commercially.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Feb 8, 2011 @ 1:13 pm
I think you should add a little economics here. If the markets heard of such a huge discovery and that such a large hoard of metals could be bought down to earth profitably ,then the metals prices would automatically drop like the fall of the rupee ,following discoveries of large sliver deposit in Mexico and South America.
Cohen Astrotecture
Report this comment as inappropriate
Apr 13, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
Dear Clarified,

Can you please provide the image source or credit for the drawing of the astronaut doing an EVA with a jetpack on an asteroid?

Thanks,

Marc
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jul 17, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
I find the idea of interplanetary mining very interesting, but I do find the idea of humans spending years of their lives drilling into atroids unlikely. It is a romantic reiteration of the past applied on this new frontier.

Any project that require humans in space is at least 10 times as expensive as a comparable project that that isn't. Because of that, I think it will be centuries until humans visit space for any reason other than exploration and mayby tourism.

What I think will happen is that in a few decades a few critical resources will start to run out, mostly phosphorus needed for artificial fertilizers. This will cause prices will rise to create insentives to develop other sources.

The way the astroids eventually will get mined is probably through automated drones. These would more or less autonomously select and mine rich astroids. Preferable the material would be recovered useing a mass driver to shoot the material back to earth where it somehow gets recovered. The problem would be the recovery considering the kinetic energies involved. Another solution would be to attach a solar sail on a chunk of mined material and use this to safely navigate back to earth.

One of the problem with this is that the weight of the material that can be transported back to Earth becomes limited. This means it might become advantageous to process the material on the mining site to limit the waste transported. This would require a considerably more complex and expensive drone.

If I was the eccentric billionaire Scott spoke of I would develop a mining drone weighing about 50 tonnes and send it off to the astroidbelt and then wait for it to send back neat packages of high value materials that would drop through the atmospere in some desert somewhere. I would probably not care to much about the launch expenses so I would make the next drone model self replicating, then I would sit back and wait to become very wealthy.
Vash
Report this comment as inappropriate
Aug 13, 2011 @ 12:00 am
Automation is the big game changer here. As is the advent of the space elevator. Space Elevavators will allow for cheap and cost efficient launches into space of mining equipment and the ferrying to and fro of acquired asteroid resources.

Its also very possible that with higher automation and advanced robotics, we won't require space elevators for the engineering of more sites. Since the drones may be fully automated and might benefit of narrow AI by that stage anyways. I see the analogy of miners going off to an adventurous frontier abit unlikely. It is more likely that no one will be doing manual labor in a spacesuit. What is more likely is after a well established space mining industry is accomplished, there might be administrators who oversee a large mining operation if people decide to live nearby. But the only incentive to live on these barren worlds is that life in space has become very inexpensive and the population problem is so bad that wide open and luxurious space habitats are a dime a dozen.

Then perhaps you will see a mass exodus of people leaving Earth. Another motive may be for political and social reasons, if warfare becomes more frequent, and space real estate is almost free and attractive to pioneers. There may be alot who decide living in a volatile political area is not worth it. But the incentives will be easier to get luxuries in space, and unlimited resources/housing space/higher quality of life. You can be sure that one day only the very wealthy will remain on Earth. As most underpriveledged peoples might be living in luxurious space stations with high tech entertainment... at least until we venture out to the interstellar void and discover our first Eerth like world.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Sep 2, 2011 @ 12:12 pm
I'm looking for harms and advantages for astroid mining
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 30, 2011 @ 12:00 am
@Cohen Astrotecture

"Can you please provide the image source or credit for the drawing of the astronaut doing an EVA with a jetpack on an asteroid?"

The drawing was made by Eugen Semitjov, a Swedish journalist, author and artist of Russian descent who was born in Sweden 1923.

Eugen Semitjov was an expert in spacecraft, especially Russian ones and worked as a translator from Russian during Juriy Gagarin visit to Sweden. He drawed for many of the swedish newspapers, and he really got in the limelight during spacerace between Russia and USA and his drawings was on the front page of the major newspapers. Eugen Semitjov covered the Apolloprogramme as a journalist in Florida.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 31, 2011 @ 11:11 am
who wrote this article? i might use it for a project.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Nov 15, 2011 @ 7:19 pm
The biggest factor stopping us has been the cost of getting to LEO. SpaceX is changing that with their new Falcon rockets into $2,000 to $3,000 per pound range. That is an order of magnitude improvement in cost over the space shuttle. He will start supplying the IIS starting next year. They have plans on the drawing board to bring that cost down by another 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. Yes, that is right; we could see launch costs in the sub $100 range by the end of the decade.

Alwin, it is not likely anything other than extremely rare metals will be taken back to Earth, so the Earth economy will not be affected. The question though is that if we get Earth the LEO costs down to $100/pound can mining still out compete bringing them up from the surface. I think it will in the end, but I have to run the numbers first. Elon Musk with SpaceX is in the perfect position to take the lead in space colonization and Asteroid mining. He has the money, the vision and most importantly the guts to do it.

Trying to capture 1 meter asteroids will not pay. They are too hard to find, and there are not enough resources to be worth chasing them down. A better idea might be to put a permanent mine on something a bit bigger, say one to two klicks wide. The mine works year round slowly grinding up material and depositing it in a large bag. Once or twice a year, a tug comes by and picks up the bag with maybe a few hundred metric tons of ore or volatiles.

Creating the finished materials at the asteroid will be very complex and probably require people to have hands on. This requires an extremely long stay on site. Mining and transport however is easily automated with robots of today’s caliber. This means it will be cheaper and safer to process raw ores closer to Earth rather than at the asteroid. Eventually, down the road, there may be roaming colonies of several thousand people moving from asteroid to asteroid like gypsy miners; but that’s still a few years away.

The preferred fuel will probably be Oxygen since it is so prevalent in all asteroids. It is burned efficiently in a plasma rocket. Another but more complicated option is Aluminum powder and oxygen. Both options can be created in situ.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Apr 29, 2012 @ 10:10 am
A craft could be designed and built with present tech in a modular fashion. The pieces could be sent to the ISS and assembled, and launched to a preselected NEO. The craft would grap onto the NEO and guide it to earth or moon orbit for processing, I would choose near the moon. In a lunar orbit would be the processing and smelting centre. A very large array of mirrors could be used to focus light and heat to provide energy. The build up would require a moon outpost. Men could be rotated between the moon and processing plant. On the moon would be manufactureing and food production. In orbit The processing end of the opperation would be sending materials to both the earth and the moon. The furnace end would be able to smelt metals for all uses. Capable of making small castings for the machine shops on the surface. Also able to making very large parts. Large sturdy pieces to be used in building projects. Space station moduals could be fabricated in single miles long pieces. Very little material would need to come frome earth. Mining on the moon would provide materials to build the housing and facilities to manufacture space ships, space tugs, space stations, domes with filtered light for agriculture, and all things neede for every day life.

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How Humans Will Mine Asteroids and Comets forum